Payola Scandal Rocks free essay sample

It is the unlawful act of installment or other instigation by record organizations for the communicate of accounts on music radio, in which the melody is introduced as being a piece of the typical days communicate. A radio broadcast can play a particular melody in return for cash, yet this must be revealed broadcasting in real time as being supported broadcast appointment, and that playing of the tune ought not be considered a normal play.  The occasions the melodies are played can impact the apparent fame of a tune. The term Payola is a play on the words pay and Victrola, which means to pay off to play on the radio Victrola was a phonograph made in the mid 1920s by the Victor Talking Machine Company of Camden, New Jersey, and turned into a word utilized for radio-phonograph mixes of various kinds with an encased listening horn or speaker in the bureau, similarly as Kleenex is utilized for all facial tissue paper in a case. Payola implies a pay off to impact the programming substance of a communicate radio, TV or satellite TV program and is a government offense. It really started in 1958, with the notorious game show outrages, in which government agents uncovered that the fiercely well known NBC-TV show Twenty-One and $64,000 Question were fixed. That outrage prompted the examination of comparable practices in radio. On January 25, 1960†¦the National Association of Broadcasters suggested that radio plate racers tolerating installment from record names for broadcasting specific melodies would be charged a $500 fine and go through a year in jail. The training, known as payola, had incited a broad examination by theâ National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) . In May 1960, circle racer and TV character Alan Freed, who begat the term awesome, was captured alongside seven others on doubt of business pay off. Liberated had would not sign a sworn statement in 1959, denying that he had acknowledged payola, which was not illegal around then. He said he would acknowledge a blessing in the event that he had helped somebody, however he would not accept kickbacks to play a record. He was accused of 26 checks of business pay off, however got off with aâ fine. Radio circle racer Dick Clark, in declaration before a House subcommittee, denied association in the payola radio outrage of 1959 and 1960. Clark, one of the main two disk jockeys in the nation had a lot to lose, and immediately surrendered all his melodic advantages when requested to do as such by ABC-TV. In declaration, analyst Bernard Goldsmith†¦brought in by Clark†¦stated that Clark had a 27% enthusiasm for records played in the previous 28 months and those records had a 23% ubiquity rating. The board of trustees was paralyzed as they thought about what started things out the chicken or the egg Clark affirmed that the main explanation he had engaged with those organizations were for the assessment focal points. He conceded a $125 interest in Jamie records restored a benefit of $11,900 and of the 163 melodies he had rights to, 143 were given to him. When interrogated concerning Jamie Records, it was found that Jamie paid out $15,000â in payola, however Clark denied ever tolerating any. The board unmistakably didn't trust Clark†¦but he got a slap on the wrist. Actually, panel director Orin Hatch considered Clark a fine youngster. THE SORDID HISTORY OF PAYOLA In 2003, Cliff Doerksen of the Washington City Paper, composed that payola isnt truly back simply back in the news. Payola has been a consistent general piece of the economy of well known music for around 125 years, and the probability that lawmakers will have the option to do anything productive about it is about a high as the chances of winning the war on drugs. It was old when jazz was new, it despite everything will be going solid long after awesome has passed on. Ages of reformers have gone facing payola and those rare sorts of people who have achieved anything enduring have succeeded distinctly in compounding the situation. Transforming a tune into cash requires monotonous presentation. Regardless of how irresistible a tune may be, it wont go anyplace with the majority until they get the opportunity to hear it†¦a part. Likewise, a firm with a promising new number on its hands was obliged to take action by paying to have the melody performed until such time as famous interest for it became self continuing and the bucks started overflowing with a procedure known as putting a tune over. Preceding the appearance of radio, melody stopping efforts involved the coordinated expense of money pay-offs as well as different payments another suit or dress, some gear, an instance of alcohol, a bit of the tune sovereignties, the administrations of a whore to fragile living creature and-blood entertainers. By a wide margin the most significant of these were vagrant vaudevillians, who, once paid†¦would convey a distributers tune clear over the mainland, uncovering it each exhibition in turn from the phases of several venues to a total crowd of millions. The greater the star, the more important were their administrations as a tune advertiser. Main events working the hotshot circuits remained to make so a lot or more from his tune stopping as they did from their showy pay rates. Be that as it may, littler entertainers were additionally in line to get a lot of the join. This was genuine even of entertainers whose abilities were not basically melodic. Artists, performers and magicians, for instance, attempted to music†¦and music distributers thought that it was advantageous to help them in choosing suitable backup for their demonstrations. On the nearby level, for all intents and purposes anybody associated with interceding between the music business and people in general remained to profit by the magnanimity of the distributers. Men's club vocalists and move groups were all accepting bribes. In any case, so was the visually impaired busker whose one ability was winding the wrench of a wheezing curbside barrel organ; likewise the person responsible for loading the moves in the coin-worked player piano in cantinas and penny arcades. There were a million different edges to the melody stopping racket, yet the point stands:â Payola was at that point an omnipresent element of urban life. It was additionally legal†¦although deciphered and still, after all that as an indication of the moral chapter 11 of those in charge of the music business. Paying someone to put a melody before the open dates to the beginning of the cutting edge well known music industry. At the tallness of the outrage, Billboard magazine guaranteed that payola in different structures had been regular during the enormous band period of the 1930s and 1940s and in the vaudeville business during the 20s. In any case, payola on the scale that got obvious during the 50s was the result of an extraordinary combination of conditions the development of jammin, the presentation of the cheap 45 RPM single, radios move to Top 40 music once TV seized show, after war flourishing, and the appearance of young people as a financial power. During the 50s, records were taking over from live execution as the rule approach to hear†¦and sell†¦music. Record industry head honchos were very much aware that young people had money, adored jammin, tuned in to the radio, and were effortlessly rushed into purchasing hit records by well known emcees. The inquiry was the way best to misuse that flighty market. At that point, a significant record organization may discharge upwards of a hundred singles every week. At that point, as now, perhaps 10 percent of those would become hits, or if nothing else make a benefit for the name. Radio air play was the most effortless route for a craftsman to get introduction and sell records, yet with singles filling the stations at such a quick clasp, names required an approach to recognize their melodies from those of their rivals. Since this was before the period of MTV and smooth advancements, pay off appeared the best approach. Record names recruited advertisers who paid disk jockeys to highlight melodies by preferred craftsmen. Will the act of payola proceed? Its begging to be proven wrong. Rarely do now, and with such a large number of radio broadcasts possessed by combinations, theres less open door for the neighborhood advertise bargain making that was so pervasive in payolas prime.

Motor Training Essays - Educational Psychology, Learning Disability

Engine Training Engine preparing to create status, inspiration and methods for articulation, as a reason for learning programs Engine action is quick turning into an important guide in the educating of scholarly subjects to primary younger students. The acknowledgment of the spot engine action has in the study hall doesn't infer that physical movement is an essential to adapting yet rather a strategy through which a kid can learn all the more effectively and see all the more completely. Preparing in physical coordination isn't just useful in furnishing a youngster with a mode for communicating what has been realized, yet it has become a factor in ingraining in the kid an eagerness and availability to learn and has likewise presented itself as a base for a learning program. One author, Maritain (1966), has depicted the capacity of instruction as essentially a wellspring of freedom. On account of the youngster whose taking in issues originate from a learning incapacity, this freedom would comprise of permitting the kid to move about, to investigate, and to get impressions, to react and to communicate. This call for development as a premise of learning is additionally validated by Getman's hypothesis that the ability of engine control and coordination is an essential to each savvy action. Cratty (1970) further expresses that development is getting the hang of; learning requires development. A few scholars appear to credit all intelligent accomplishment to engine improvement as opposed to survey engine movement as a guide to learning. One hypothesis suggests that specific engine exercises when appropriately applied would get ready youngsters in the scholarly territories of spelling, perusing, and comparable scholarly errands during the kid's first year in school. Cratty 1970). This hypothesis may remain constant if the engine exercises are by one way or another identified with the scholarly procedures included. Remember that ordinary kids have other

What Facilitation Really Means and Why Its Key to the Future of Work

What “Facilitation” Really Means and Why It’s Key to the Future of Work In recent years, there has been increasing interest in a skill known as facilitation.Employers are increasingly looking for employees with facilitation skills, and facilitation has even been touted as the key to the future of work.As more workplaces abandon the traditional reliance on hierarchical structure and become more reliant on collaboration and problem solving, rather than just tactical execution, demand for facilitation skills will only keep increasing, and therefore, it is important to start developing this key skill early enough.But what exactly does facilitation mean, and why is it so important to the future of work?WHAT IS FACILITATION?When you ask someone to be a facilitator, the first thing they will probably think about is chairing a meeting or making presentations. This is a total misconception.Facilitation is about creating a structure and environment that makes it easy for people to collaborate.Facilitation is about bringing diverse groups of people together and mak ing it easy for them to work together to come up with a solution to a problem.The term facilitate is derived from the Latin word “facilis”, which means “to render less difficult” or “to make easy.”In the modern context, a number of definitions of facilitation have been put across.According to Trevor Bentley, a facilitator, independent consultant and author of the book Facilitation: Providing Opportunities For Learning, facilitation can be defined as:“the provision of opportunities, resources, encouragement and support for the group to succeed in achieving its objectives and to do this through enabling the group to take control and responsibility for the way they proceed.”Facilitation is important in any process that requires people to work together to come up with a desired result without being bound by the constraints of hierarchical structure.This includes processes such as brainstorming sessions, meetings, team building sessions, planning sessions, training and de velopment sessions, conflict resolution, or any other activity that requires a group of people to collaborate to achieve specific predetermined results.WHO IS A FACILITATOR? According to Ingrid Bens, a certified public facilitator and author of several books on facilitation, a facilitator can be defined as:“One who contributes structure and process to interactions so groups are able to function effectively and make high quality decisions. A helper and enabler whose goal is to support others as they achieve exceptional performance.” The role of a facilitator. Source: Steps ForwardAs a facilitator, your role is to guide the different people participating in a process to ensure that they come up with the desired results together.You provide the tools and structure needed to ensure that everyone plays a role in the process and that the process is constantly moving forward.However, as a facilitator, you do not get to make decisions for the group. Instead, your role is to provide a framework to help the group make decisions by itself.Some of your tasks as a facilitator include establishing an objective for the process, creating an environment that provides opportunities for contribution and discussion, making suggestions that will help the process run more smoothly, interrupting speakers who might be drifting from the objectives of the process, and generally steering the group towards constructive solutions.One important thing to note is that anyone can be a facilitator. You don’t need to hold any titles or have ce rtain levels of experience in order to play the role of a facilitator.All you need is the ability to bring people together and create an atmosphere that makes it possible for them to collaborate towards a common objective.This means that facilitation is not only reserved for managers and other business leaders.Actually, there are some managers who are poor at facilitation.On the other hand, having someone who is not in the group’s leadership as a facilitator helps break down the constraints of hierarchical structure, thus making everyone feel more comfortable with sharing their opinions and ideas.THE FACILITATION ZONEFacilitation is a somewhat delicate process that requires the facilitator to maintain a balance between encouraging the members to participate in the process and controlling the process.If the facilitator focuses so much on encouraging participation, there is a high likelihood that the session will turn into an animated but unregulated discussion that will take so muc h time without achieving anything meaningful.On the other hand, if the facilitator focuses so much on controlling the process, the participants might feel like their participation is stifled, thus making it harder to come up with the best solution.Therefore, everything the facilitator does should be aimed at encouraging the participants to share their contributions, while at the same time ensuring that the session does not degenerate into a meaningless discussion.WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FACILITATING AND CHAIRING A MEETINGLike I mentioned earlier, when most people come across the word facilitation, they confuse it with chairing a meeting, probably because both involve taking charge of the meeting or whatever activity is taking place.However, there are some differences between facilitating and chairing.Usually, someone chairing a meeting acts as the seat of wisdom and knowledge within the group.Even though a chair may give the participants opportunities to contribute, his or he r opinions carry more weight, and it is ultimately up to the chair to make the final decision for the group.The role of the facilitator, on the other hand, is not to give opinions or make decisions for the group, but rather to draw out the opinions and ideas of the participants and provide them with a framework for making decisions wholesomely as a group.In addition, a good facilitator does not take sides. He or she guides the process from a neutral point.Being an effective facilitator also involves developing a structure to ensure everyone’s ideas get heard and making sure every participant is comfortable sharing their ideas, and ensuring that the participants do not feel like their ideas and decisions are being influenced by their leader.While there is a difference between facilitating and chairing a meeting, the best chairs also play the role of facilitators.They give everyone equal opportunity to contribute, rather than hogging the mic at all times or acting like they have all the answers.WHY FACILITATION IS KEY TO THE FUTURE OF WORKToday, there is increasing demand for people with facilitation skills at the workplace, and as we march into the future, facilitation will become even more important.There are a number of factors contributing to the increasing demand for facilitation.First, the world is diversifying at a very rapid pace.Technological advancement has turned the world into a global village.Today, several companies have footprints spanning across different countries and continents.Other companies â€" with the help of the internet and other communication technologies â€" depend on employees spread out across multiple geographical locations and time zones.The result is that the modern workplace has become very diverse. In the coming future, the trend of workplace diversity will only increase.The diversity of modern workplaces is a good thing.When you bring together people from different backgrounds, with different experiences and different perspec tives to work on a common problem, there is a high likelihood that creative and innovative solutions will emerge.However, owing to their diversity, you can’t simply bring these people together and hope that they will work together on their own to come up with solutions.This is where facilitation comes in. Facilitation makes it possible for businesses to harness this diversity and channel it productively.Second, the business environment is becoming increasingly competitive.Actually, the world has become hypercompetitive.Business are increasingly finding it harder to sustain competitive advantage, and we can expect this trend to continue into the future.With such high levels of competition, any business that wants to remain in business needs a high dose of creativity and innovation from its employees.One of the best ways of fostering creativity and innovation at the workplace is to encourage employees to work in teams.When employees work in teams, they are quicker and more effective in their work.Having several minds exploring a problem is also more likely to uncover unconventional solutions that would not have come up otherwise.This usually happens in brainstorming sessions where team members come together on a common platform to offer various perspectives that might lead to novel solutions, which in turn helps the business remain competitive.In order for team work to be successful, however, there is need for effective facilitation.This means that facilitation is critical for the success of the organization in the age of hyper competition.Finally, the growing diversity of the modern workplace means that it is inevitable that there will be conflicts at the workplace.Whenever people from diverse backgrounds and with diverse perspectives come together, conflict cannot really be avoided.But here is the thing about conflict at the workplace â€" it can either be destructive, or it can be channelled creative to come up with innovative process, products and solutions .The key is to manage conflict effectively so that it results in creativity rather than destruction.In order to do this, there is need for effective facilitation.Considering these factors, it is inevitable that the importance of facilitation at the workplace will only keep growing.HOW TO BE AN EFFECTIVE FACILITATOR Being a good facilitator is a skill, and like most other skills, it can be learnt. Below, we look at tips on how to improve this key skill. Source: Cleverism.comAlways Start by Setting Some Ground Rules and ObjectivesWhenever you are called upon to facilitate a meeting, brainstorming session, or any other process, the first thing you should always do is to lay the ground rules and objectives of the process.Give the participants an outline structure of how you intend the session to run.Make it clear what you expect of the participants and what will not be tolerated, such as criticising others opinions or disrespect for other participants.Help the participants to clarify what the desired outcome is, and make sure that this outcome can be reasonably achieved within the available time.Ensure that there is consensus about the objectives of the session to avoid someone bringing up something new somewhere down the line.Doing this also helps foster a sense of ownership among the participants.You also need to make sure the participants understand that your role in the process is only to facilitate, not to push your own agenda.The aim here is to foster an atmosphere of trust and openness.While establishing the ground rules, you also need to determine how any potential disagreements will be dealt with.The good thing about establishing boundaries is that you are in a better position to notice when the participants veer of the track and bring them back to ensure that the desired outcome is achieved within the available time.You Have to be Good at Time ManagementWhether you are facilitating a meeting, a team building session, or a conflict resolution, you probably don’t have the whole day.Therefore, as a facilitator, it is up to you to decide how the objectives of the session can be met within the given time frame.When planning the structure outline for the session, think about each activity and how much time it is supposed to take.Considering that each participant needs to get heard, you should plan time allocations more efficiently than in a regular, run of the mill meeting.Make sure it is clear to the group how much time is allocated for each activity.Once you allocate the time for each activity, you also need to ensure that the time allocations are followed, else the time will run out before the objectives for the session have been achieved.Keep track of the time and come up with a way of notifying people that time is running up when it seems like they will exceed their allocated time.For instance, you could hold up your fingers to let them know how much time they have remaining, or you could simply say it loud.If someone goes beyond their allocated time, don’t be afraid to interrupt them and ask them to wind up.Encourage ParticipationAs a facilitator, this is one of your most important jobs.If someone feels like their contributions and ideas are being stifled, they will refrain from making further contributions, which means that the session will not effectively serve its purpose.As a facilitator, it is up to you to find ways to make the environment inclusive, so that the participa nts not only feel comfortable sharing their ideas, but are actually encouraged to contribute.If you notice that some of the participants have not contributed, reach out to them and encourage them to speak out.You should also design structures and activities that encourage contribution.For instance, you could divide the group into smaller discussion groups, since people are more likely to share their ideas and opinions when dealing with a smaller group of people.Remain ImpartialThis is another important thing to keep in mind when playing the role of a facilitator.As a facilitator, your main task is to draw out the contributions of the participants and guide the group to make a decision on their own, without in any way influencing the outcome yourself.This is not as easy as it sounds.Remaining impartial means that you should suppress your opinions and ideas while moderating the ideas and opinions of others.Whatever you do, you should help the group reach consensus without imposing you r opinions on them. At the end of the session, the group should feel that they have achieved the outcome by themselves.Always Be Ready to InterveneWhile you are not actually chairing the meeting or brainstorming session, you are still in charge of the session, and it is up to you to make sure it ends successfully.This means that you should constantly monitor what is going on and determining whether it is taking the group closer to its objectives.If something happens that you feel is taking away from the objectives of the group, you should be ready to intervene and get the group back on track.For instance, if someone is taking more time than they are allocated, you should intervene and let them know that they have to give time to other participants.Similarly, if someone says or does something that is disrespectful to another participant, you should step in and let them know that disrespect will not be tolerated.The point here is that you should always be ready to step in and stop any thing that might make it harder to achieve the objectives of the group.Be Sensitive to Individual and Group FeelingsI already mentioned earlier that facilitation is all about fostering an atmosphere of trust, openness and respect.In order to do this, you need to be able to use your senses, your instincts and your intuition to pick up the atmosphere and gauge how the participants are individually responding to the topic being discussed and the opinions of other participants.When some of the participants feel uncomfortable, angry, or even hurt by something that was said, most of them will not speak up about their discomfort.Instead, they will silently pull out from the discussion.As a facilitator, it is up to you to read the body language and emotional temperature of the participants and gauge whether everyone is feeling comfortable with the discussion.Take note of those who are talking and those who are not and try to get them involved.Aside from being sensitive to the feelings of th e individual participants, you should also be sensitive to the group chemistry.How does the entire group feel?Are they eager, bored, angry, restless, enthusiastic, or suspicious?Once you perceive the group chemistry, you should then try to influence it in a way that promotes participation and engagement.For instance, if the group is bored, try to bring in some engaging activities or humour to bring up group energy.Probe the ParticipantsSometimes, there will be participants who will remain clammed up despite your best efforts of creating an atmosphere of trust and openness.Still, it is important to hear what they have to say. Probing is a great way of getting such participants to express themselves.For instance, if you notice someone has not spoken, you can nudge them with questions such as “What are your thoughts on this, Suzie?”Probing is also a great way of ensuring that everyone’s contribution is clear.When a participant shares ideas or opinions that are not very clear, pro be them with more questions to get them to elaborate their ideas till everyone in the room has understood what they are saying.Synthesize IdeasWhen a diverse group of people is sharing their individual ideas, it sometimes becomes difficult for some of the participants to make sense of what is being said or to understand how it ties to the bigger picture.As a facilitator, it is up to you to take the different ideas from different people and express them in a succinct manner that allows everyone to understand how the ideas are connected to the whole.Once someone has finished making their contribution, give a summary of what they said and confirm if that is what they actually meant.This minimizes the chances of some participants’ contributions getting misinterpreted.WRAPPING UPFacilitation is an important skill, and as the modern workplace continues becoming more diverse and more competitive, the importance of this skill will only keep increasing.Therefore it is important to start de veloping your facilitation skills.Remember, facilitation is all about bringing diverse groups of people together and making it easy for them to work together to come up with a solution to a problem.With the tips shared in this article, you can start slowly improving your facilitation skills.Considering that facilitation requires lots of skill in reading other people’s body language and behaviour, you need to practice a lot.The more you practice, the better you will get.

Boethian Concepts in The Wanderer - Literature Essay Samples

Boethius’s The Consolation of Philosophy and the Old English poem â€Å"The Wanderer† are both testament to the enduring quality of literature. Writing in the sixth century A.D., Boethius discusses such varied topics as happiness, the existence of evil, and the path to God while locked in a cell with the goddess Philosophy. In contrast, â€Å"The Wanderer,† an elegy originally written in Old English, is a poem told from the point of view of an exile mourning his despondent existence away from the community. Though it was written almost five centuries later, it reflects many of the philosophical tenets outlined in Boethius’s account. It expresses life as a merely transient existence, arguing that happiness can only be found in God and that fate is an integral part of the human experience.Both texts agree on the transient nature of human existence. For example, to the narrator in â€Å"The Wanderer,† wealth is but a temporary means of happiness that i s ultimately transitory and will eventually be destroyed along with the rest of the world. This sentiment is evoked when he writes that â€Å"wealth is fleeting† (108), and in another line predicts that â€Å"all the wealth of this world stands waste† (74) until the universe will â€Å"stand empty† (109). This belief mirrors the teachings of Boethius’s Consolation in many ways. First, both works hold that one shouldn’t be attached to wealth because it serves no purpose in the end. Boethius’s Fortune explains that she holds the power to â€Å"withdraw [her] gifts† (21) whenever she wants to and condemns humans for the desire to be â€Å"enhanced by external adornment† (29). Although the narrator of â€Å"The Wanderer† doesn’t explicitly say that God eventually strips us from our material possessions, his belief in our ultimate destruction likens his â€Å"Father in heaven† (117) to the role of Fortune in the sense that what is provided to us can just as easily be taken away. Secondly, both suggest that the only remedy for this desire is a spiritual relationship with God, one that will outlive the material world. The pursuit of happiness also assumes an ephemeral presence in both â€Å"The Wanderer† and Consolation. Both narrators find themselves in exile, only able to seek consolation through poetic expression that finds their surroundings meaningless and temporary. Philosophy outlines three pursuits that ultimately lead nowhere: wealth, respect, and fame. But all of these ventures cause nothing but detriment. Wealth brings worry (46), power brings disdain (48), and fame is nothing but false celebration (49). These vacuous enterprises render men into animals who fail to establish a spiritual connection in this transitory life. Although the narrator in â€Å"The Wanderer† doesn’t seem to lament a moral forfeiture like Philosophy, his displeasure is simply because th ose things aren’t eternal. Those â€Å"eager for fame often bind fast a sorrowing soul† (17). His â€Å"memory of kinsmen† (51) brings temporary solace, but â€Å"they always swim away† (53), and in the end, â€Å"rulers lie deprived of all joys† (99) â€Å"as if it had never been† (96). The world of â€Å"The Wanderer† is only temporary and describes aspects of civilization as a whole being â€Å"wrecked† (85) by â€Å"The Creator† (84). In the last few lines, the only hope for redemption is for those who â€Å"seek mercy† (116) in God. Since the world is empty, the only path to true happiness is through virtue. Philosophy asserts that all earthly attempts toward happiness are simply inadequate since humans by nature exist outside of God. The realm of humans is grounded on possessions and material things, and the pursuits previously discussed. But the realm of God is â€Å"the true and perfect good† (55), and intersects with the worldly realm through the pursuit of intellect, spirituality, and virtue. As mentioned before, Boethius concludes that happiness is not found in material things. But since power and wealth are the only standards we use to measure happiness, then the true measure lies outside of ourselves, in God. That realm is bridged by virtue. The character in â€Å"The Wanderer† outlines the makings of a wise man:A wise man must be patient, / neither too hot-hearted nor too hasty with words, / nor too weak in war nor too unwise in thoughts / neither fretting nor fawning nor greedy for wealth, / never eager for boasting before he truly understands; / a man must wait, when he makes a boast, / until the brave spirit understands truly / whither the thoughts of his heart will turn. (65-72)At the midpoint in the narrator’s journey, his definitions of virtuosity seem more secular and grounded in social mores than spiritual. Just like Boethius, who at first judges ha ppiness by secular standards but later gains spiritual insight, here we don’t see the narrator’s assumption of true virtue just yet. In the final stanza he concludes, â€Å"He is good who keeps his word† (112) or in other words, he who keeps faith and trusts in God. The narrative ends on a spiritual note, praising godly insight when he says, â€Å"It will be well for one who seeks mercy, consolation from the Father in heaven, where for us all stability stands† (115-120). The line â€Å"all stability† contrasts with his descriptions of earth as â€Å"dark† (59), â€Å"empty† (86), and â€Å"toilsome† (106), giving the sense that redemption is possible only through God. Both works seem to promote the sense that hardship gives perspective to achieve virtue as well. In â€Å"The Wanderer,† we find the narrator â€Å"alone† (1) and â€Å"troubled in mind† (2) on the â€Å"path of exile† (33). His reminis cing of a past epoch alongside family and friends brings â€Å"great joy† (52), highlighting his desire for company. He acknowledges that â€Å"a man cannot become wise, before he has weathered his share of winters in this world† (63-65), giving a sense of ambivalence to his exile. He mourns the loss of companionship but praises it as a necessary factor in the path towards wisdom. That thinking mirrors Boethius, whose outside perspective of the world allowed him solace through deep introspection with Philosophy. Perhaps the most similar factor in the two works is the role of fate, or â€Å"wyrd.† In Boethian terms, there are two distinguishing roles: Providence and fate. God’s plan â€Å"when envisaged in the total clarity of the divine intelligence† (87) is called Providence. Fate pans out on a smaller scale, â€Å"to the things which that intelligence moves and orders† (87). Philosophy then goes on to describe Providence as God’s pl an in the long run, which, since it takes place outside of the constraints of time and space, humans will never fully comprehend. Fate, however, is the agent of Providence, acting in tangible ways in the course of man’s actions. The role of wyrd in â€Å"The Wanderer† mirrors the former less than the latter. The concept first appears in the beginning with the narrator exclaiming that â€Å"wyrd is fully fixed!† (5). It appears again in the line, â€Å"a storm of spears took away the warriors, bloodthirsty weapons, wyrd the mighty, and storms batter these stone walls† (99-101). These two examples are instances of fate having a direct, tangible effect on people. In line 5, the narrator seems to admit his wyrd being the cause of his exile, and in line 100, wyrd is attributed as the cause of the soldier’s downfall. Boethius shows that Providence is outside of human understanding. The fact that the narrator in â€Å"The Wanderer† is able to compr ehend wyrd shows that it’s a reflection of Boethian fate. It’s an agent of God’s supreme will being enacted through the minutae, actions that affect humans directly. This idea is sealed when he writes â€Å"the working of wyrd changes the world under heaven† (107). In previous lines he predicts that a storm will kill all of the warriors, destroy the walls, frost will bind the earth, and darkness will take over. The fact that wyrd changes the world tangibly shows how it is fated because humans will directly experience it as an agent of God’s infinite will.In conclusion, although the two works were written almost 500 years apart, they contain many of the same philosophical principles. â€Å"The Wanderer† reflects Boethian themes about material goods, emphasizing that nothing material in this life is worth pursuing because in the end it will be meaningless. Virtue cannot be obtained in the human realm, so man must seek a relationship with God i n order to complete his existence in life. Fate, although sometimes punishing, is merely the agent of Providence, and in the long run, God’s will for man.Works CitedBoethius. The Consolation of Philosophy. 2nd. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Print. Unknown, â€Å"The Wanderer.† The Broadview Anthology of British Literature: The Medieval Period. Comp. Joseph Black. Toronto: Broadview Press, 2009. Print.

Childrens Book Reviews

`` Araby `` By James Joyce And The Love Song Of J. Alfred...

Your identity is as simple as who you are. Yet there are a few things that can change this such as new beliefs, or certain life experiences. We see examples of these in two different pieces of literature, â€Å"Araby† by James Joyce and â€Å"The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock† by T.S. Elliot. Things that happen in your life can shape and mold who you become. For example we have Alfred Prufrock who is embarrassed by his own life, unhappy, and afraid of rejection. Something must have happened in his life to the point where he refuses to take chances, yet he is highly dissatisfied with his life. However that’s his identity He wants so bad to be social yet he feels as if everyone is talking about him. â€Å"(They will say: â€Å"How his hair is growing thin!†)† or â€Å"(They will say: ‘But how his arms and legs are thin!†)†. (Lines 41 and 44) He is too worried about other people’s opinions to go for what he wishes to have. He even states â€Å"I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each. I do not think that they will sing to me.† (Lines 123-124) He has such little self-confidence that he believes not even mermaids want to lure him in. He is saying he is not even good enough to be a sea monster’s dinner. Even though Prufrock feels as if everyone is gossiping about him, there is no proof in the poem. The only evidence we have is said about the woman. Its states â€Å"And I have known the arms already, known them all:† (Lines 62). It seems as if he has known this woman for a while. He notices the littleShow MoreRelatedModernism - Araby and the Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock Essay1382 Words   |  6 Pagesof the world as fractured and chaotic, especially due to paralysis and alienation in modern society. This newly perceived reality is reflected through techniques of fragmentation in modernist works such as James Joyce’s short story â€Å"Araby† and T.S. Eliot’s poem â€Å"The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock†. In the late 1800s and early 1900s, fundamental and far-reaching changes in society often made individuals feel wary and estranged from their surrounding world. These changes included urbanization, technologicalRead MoreAnalysis Of Araby And The Love Song Of J. Alfred Prufrock1776 Words   |  8 Pageswonderful experience full of joy or a horrible, hellish chamber full of uncertainty and despair. This paper discusses how different characters in the short stories â€Å"Araby† and The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock are prisoners of anticipation. It shows how it stifles the characters’ ability to live life to the fullest. James Joyce published â€Å"Araby† in 1914 in his short-story collection of Dubliners. It is about an introverted young boy who is fumbling towards adulthood with an infatuation towards a girlRead MoreHow to Read Lit Like a Prof Notes3608 Words   |  15 PagesMetamorphoses by Ovid—transformation (Kafka) f. Oedipus: family triangles, being blinded, dysfunctional family g. Cassandra: refusing to hear the truth h. A wronged woman gone violent in her grief and madness—Aeneas and Dido or Jason and Medea i. Mother love—Demeter and Persephone 10. It’s more than just rain or snow a. Rain i. fertility and life ii. Noah and the flood iii. Drowning—one of our deepest fears b. Why? i. plot device ii. atmospherics iii. misery factor—challenge characters iv. democratic element—theRead MoreBusiness and Management2600 Words   |  11 Pages | | | | |Boys and Girls, Alice Munro (pp. 772-781) | | | | |â€Å"Araby,† James Joyce (pp. 879-883) | | | | |Everyday Use, Alice Walker (pp. 1087-1093) | Read MoreFacilitating Learning and Assessment in Practice3273 Words   |  14 Pageshave learned from them! For me, knowledge is an insatiable being and education is knowledge’s food source and, being a glutton for knowledge, education will continue to be, for me, a basic necessity. [pic] Sample Self-Reflective Essay #1 Despite my love for reading literature of all types, my background in English studies is not as varied as I would like it to be. I was a student in a beginning literature class in high school. Although I do not recall all of the works we studied, as that was twelve

A Treatise Concerning The Principles Of Human Knowledge

â€Å"Esse est percipi†. To be is to perceive, and to exist and to be perceived are one and the same. In the philosophical work of â€Å"A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge†, this one of the most famous principles which made Bishop George Berkeley one of the early modern period’s most acclaimed polymaths. Berkeley was a Bishop closely affiliated to the Anglican Church and a staunch critic of other philosophers of the past such as Rene Descartes and John Locke. Though initially impressed by their rigorous rhetoric, he could not bring himself to accept their views which were against his fundamental beliefs and which he viewed as flawed, leaning towards skepticism and atheism, two forces of the time which he was not fond of. Following his studies and extensive travels thereafter, his philosophy gradually developed. Berkley refuted the answers proposed by his predecessors, instead, advocating for pursuing concepts such as common sense and learning directly from what experience provided through the senses. Famously known to be a stalwart defender of the notion of â€Å"idealism†, or the view that reality consists exclusively of the mind, the spirit and its ideas, he promoted the belief of independent beings which were able to circumvent commonly held rationale to explain the unexplainable. Berkeley emphasized that given the acquaintance with our perceptions, the material world consequently was a mere representation of our spirits. In other words, no substance or permanenceShow MoreRelatedInterpreting A Treatise Concerning The Principles Of Human Knowledge Essay1401 Words   |  6 PagesCoursework 1: Reading a text 1. Interpreting ‘’A TREATISE CONCERNING THE PRINCIPLES OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE’’-GEORGE BERKELEY I am referring to the human knowledge as ideas, either gained through our senses (sight, taste, smell, touch and hearing), or by the operations of the mind, or as a combination of these two types with the intervention of memory and imagination. We can say that a collection of our senses creates ideas, and a collection of ideas constitutes an object. For instance, if we are thinkingRead MoreGeorge Berkeley s A Treatise Concerning The Principles Of Human Knowledge Essay1513 Words   |  7 PagesPerhaps yet, it may have been the work of a divine mind, taking helm of the way my thoughts flowed. These were all questions that came up as I read through George Berkeley s, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.  For in his manuscript, he addresses skepticism about the physical world, that is the ambiguity humans have in how a physical world outside of our minds is like. Berkeley has a simple solution to this. Through his interpretations of ideas, Berkeley comes to the con clusion thatRead MoreJohn Locke Essay608 Words   |  3 Pagesgovernment appointments. In 1669, in one of his official capacities, Locke wrote a constitution for the proprietors of the Carolina Colony in North America, but it was never put into effect. In 1671 Locke began to write his greatest work, the Essay Concerning Human Understanding, which took nearly twenty years to complete since he was deeply engaged in Shaftesburys political affairs. In 1675, after the liberal Shaftesbury had fallen from favor, Locke went to France. In 1679 he returned to England, butRead MoreHume and Knowledge Creation766 Words   |  3 PagesHume and knowledge creation The dominant work by Hume was his A Treatise of Human Nature, in this work he attempted to construct a science of man that contrasted with the ideas of Descartes and other enlightenment thinkers. The pillar of Humes divergence was anchoring knowledge in empiricism rather than rationality. Hume argued that desire instead of rationality was the foundation of human nature. This essential departure from his peers is important to understanding the work of Hume. In thisRead MoreDifferences Between Hylas And Philonous1191 Words   |  5 Pages and can be expanded upon in another one of Berkeley’s works, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Berkeley’s work, Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous, can be described as a series of dialogues between Hylas and Philonous regarding philosophical issues such as God and materialistic substances as well as ideas. The overall goal of the work was â€Å"to demonstrate the reality and perfection of human knowledge† along with â€Å" the incorporeal nature of the soul, and the immediateRead MoreWhat Does Locke Mean By Returning1013 Words   |  5 Pagesalso explaining about how they both function. Readers will know Locke s thoughts towards innate ideas, Hume s view towards cause and effect, and on how both Locke and Hume are relatable to one and another In Locke’s essay of, â€Å"concerning human understanding,† Locke writes how innate ideas are not real, that they are not,† born into us†(Locke p.202). Locke describes how â€Å"children, idiots, c.†(Locke p.203) Have no thought of these so called born ideas in them because if so both theRead MoreJohn Locke s Theory Of Perception And Knowledge1436 Words   |  6 PagesIn his work A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (1710), George Berkeley is presenting a theory of perception and knowledge which is both a counter to and development of John Locke’s own theory as set out in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689). Both Locke and Berkeley are empiricists, that is to say that they believe that all important truths and knowledge can be found out through attention to the senses and as such, having a valid theory of perception is crucial toRead MoreIdealism And Tlon, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius1584 Words   |  7 Page sLuis Borges’ short work of fiction titled â€Å"Tlà ¶n, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius† grapples with many philosophic issues. In the main, this short story deals with the philosophic notion of subjective idealism as posed by George Berkeley’s Treatise Concerning Principles of Human Knowledge. Within this essay I argue that, while he acknowledges the presumed irrefutability of Berkeley’s argument, Borges’ â€Å"Tlà ¶n, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius† aims to disparage both totalitarianism and Berkeleyan idealism by drawing an analogyRead MoreThe Principles Of Empiricism And The Spirit Behind It2295 Words   |  10 PagesLocke’s theory of ideas – the basic principles of empiricism and the spirit behind it; Locke’s theory of the origin and types of ideas and the problems it gave rise to. Locke, John, An Essay concerning human understanding, Everyman, 1961: Book 1, of Innate ideas, Book 2, chapter 1, of ideas in general and their origina l, Berkeley, George, A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge. Empiricists endorse the idea that we have no source of knowledge in S or for the concepts we use in S